ChatGPT moderates illegal content on sites like Facebook.

ChatGPT moderates illegal content on sites like Facebook.

GPT-4: The Future of Online Moderation

Rolf van Root / Unsplash

The internet is a vast and diverse landscape, with millions of users actively participating in forums and social networks. As digital platforms continue to evolve, so do the challenges of content moderation. OpenAI, the developer behind ChatGPT, believes that their latest language model, GPT-4, could become the solution to these challenges and bring about a more positive future for digital platforms.

In a recent blog post, OpenAI shared their vision of using GPT-4 as an online moderator, tasked with filtering out nefarious content that should not see the light of day. By leveraging artificial intelligence (AI), OpenAI argues that GPT-4 can enable faster iteration on policy changes, reducing the response time from months to hours. Additionally, GPT-4’s ability to interpret complex content policy documentation and adapt instantly to policy updates ensures more consistent labeling.

Currently, content moderation is primarily performed by human moderators, exposing them to potentially harmful and distressing content on a regular basis. This exposure takes a toll on their mental well-being, as demonstrated by cases of moderators suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). For instance, Facebook had to pay $52 million to compensate moderators who experienced PTSD due to the traumas of their job.


Introducing GPT-4 as an AI moderator could alleviate the burden on human moderators and create a safer working environment. Unlike humans, AI is immune to the mental stress associated with handling troublesome content, eliminating the concerns of burnout and PTSD. This shift would not only improve the well-being of human moderators but also contribute to a more efficient content moderation process.

However, the potential use of AI for content moderation raises questions about job security. Concerns have been voiced regarding job losses as AI takes over tasks previously performed by humans. Content moderation is a vital role, and if GPT-4 replaces humans in this area, there is a valid concern that former content moderators could face redundancy instead of being reassigned to other roles.

OpenAI’s blog post does not directly address this aspect, leaving it to content platforms to make these decisions. This omission may fuel fears that AI will be deployed by large companies as a cost-saving measure, with little consideration for the social impact of widespread job losses.

Nevertheless, the use of AI in content moderation has the potential to reduce the mental toll on overworked and underappreciated moderation teams who are responsible for ensuring the safety and integrity of platforms used by billions of people every day. It remains to be seen whether the benefits of AI-driven moderation will be offset by the devastating impact of job redundancies.

In conclusion, OpenAI’s proposal to employ GPT-4 as an online moderator represents a promising step towards a safer and more efficient digital ecosystem. By harnessing the power of AI, platforms can reduce the exposure of human moderators to distressing content and create a more sustainable working environment. However, the responsible implementation of AI in content moderation must prioritize the well-being of human workers and mitigate the potential negative consequences associated with job losses. As we move closer to this AI-driven future, it is crucial that companies exercise empathy and foresight in their decision-making processes.